Recently, I have been spending quite a bit of time thinking about the right logo for FamZoo - something that really captures the essence and style of the company. I'd like a style that appeals to both parents and children. I'd like a logo that is clean and simple, but not boring. I'd like it to be somewhat playful, yet still professional. I'd like a logo that symbolizes the key goals of FamZoo which are:
- to help busy, modern families inject some consistency and structure into their occasionally wild, "zoo"-like lives (family lives subjected to the frenetic influences of dual working parents, constant "multitasking", blurred work/family boundaries, overloaded schedules, etc.)
- to help parents introduce and encourage fiscally and socially responsible habits in children who are being regularly bombarded by an increasing array of self-indulgent and impulsive influences on the internet and elsewhere.
You can see my Elance postings for the FamZoo Logo Concept Project (along with the associated bids from service providers) here and here.
I posted the projects in mid September and allowed bids to come in for a week. I received a total of 37 bids from logo designers around the world (Canada, Ireland, Argentina, Ukraine, Indonesia, Thailand, India, Romania, Poland, Slovenia, and all over the US). I then set about the fairly time consuming task of evaluating each of the bidders and winnowing the list from 37 down to 10. This took about 2 to 3 days. To keep track of the process, I created a simple scorecard in Excel and ranked each bidder on a set of weighted criteria:
- how well the provider read and followed my bid instructions (weight=4),
- my impression of the provider's portfolio (weight=10),
- the number and quality of the provider's Elance buyer reviews (weight=10),
- my perception of the provider's ability to communicate clearly (weight=8),
- the size of the provider (I favored individual designers over larger firms since I felt I would get better individual attention and focus) (weight=7), and
- an intangible scoring that captured how well I felt the provider "resonated" with the project based on preliminary communication during the bidding phase (weight=9).
On September 30, I awarded the project to the top 10 providers in my scorecard (and one "wildcard" provider who showed a particularly keen interest to participate). I negotiated concept fees with each provider individually (since most of the bids reflected the price for delivering a finished logo, whereas I was just interested in the rough concepts). I paid almost all of the providers up front as a show of good faith. (Payments are handled through the Elance payment system using, in my case, a credit card. Note: Elance is rolling out a nice escrow feature shortly that will really enhance the payment experience for both parties, particularly for larger transactions with multiple milestones - see the announcement here.) 10 of the 11 awarded providers accepted the project and started working on their concept submissions.
Over the course of the last 2 weeks, all of the concept submissions have come in (one provider is working on one last revision cycle). Most providers did 1 to 2 rounds of revisions after receiving feedback from me on their first submissions.
In my next post, I will show all of the logo concept submissions and solicit feedback from friends and colleagues.
2 comments:
Hello Bill - What an excellent project for your company!! I will review the logo's that you have come up with (so many!). Having a marketing background, I will see which ones I like and why. From a quick glance I would pick the logo that looks the most appealing as well as "vibrant" so people will remember it over and over again. I would lean more on the professional look, but add a flair of a childrens type of figure and/or image. Brian Knebel
Hi Bill, I saw the new Escrow feature of eLance. Looks good. I used to work for Escrow.com and this type of service is an excellent added value. - Brian
Post a Comment